Source A GCSE History coursework :: essays research papers

This question is going to investigate how reliable reference work A is, about peoples attitude towards wowork forces suffrage. etymon A shows waomen holding papers and leaflets banging on the door, but John bull is barricading the door. John son of a bitch is portrayed as the British establishment not letting women into parliament to get the vote, he has fists clenched and is determined to not let women in. The women banging on the door look ugly, fat, un-ladylike and dirty, the cartoonist may be biased towards women getting the vote. This is emphasised by the title An Ugly Rush. The women protesting may be the suffragists, the leaflets and papers that the women are holding could be petitions and posters. They resemble spinsters. In the background there is a group of elegant, formal posh and ladylike women, one woman has a child. Theses women may be frowning at the masses of women in disgust. It is possible that the women in the background are the Anti-Suffrage League. The messa ge of this cartoon is that men dont want women to have the vote. The person who drew this carton could have been a biased male, against womens suffrage. This carton was out in the late 19th century early 20th century. Punch magazine was print by a group of liberals who campaigned for the poor and working classes. By 1870 the magazine was in big trouble as it could only sell 6,000 copies a workweek but it needed to sell at least 10000 copies a week to pay for the venture. So the magazine started to appeal to middle-class men. John Bull became a common figure in the magazine, around the 19th century. He was portrayed as a hero of Britain. He often wore a Federal Jack waist coat. This source may not be reliable as it could have been drawn by a biased male. But the source shows some women not campaigning for the vote, because not all women wanted to have the vote like upper-class women , they didnt care because they had a good life. The men liked some of the women for not wanting the vote so the cartoonist in this source has praised them by making them look smart and elegant, and not dirty and ugly. The Source isnt very useful because the cartoonist was biased towards womens suffrage, so he could of made the campaigning women look like a huge unorganised rabble.